Karry
Best movie of this year hands down!
Motompa
Go in cold, and you're likely to emerge with your blood boiling. This has to be seen to be believed.
Brenda
The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one
Beulah Bram
A film of deceptively outspoken contemporary relevance, this is cinema at its most alert, alarming and alive.
ryans-84390
OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES OOGIELOVES
Harold Gilbertson
the oogieloves is a wonderful masterpiece that truly shows how good art is. its a great movie that wont be outdated by anything! and i am 100% not brainwashed to do this! if you break down the movie you can see the true art form and meaning that it has. it teaches children at a young age to buy the movie 219 times on DVD now! much before the actual skill should be attempted! the movie also thought me that 9/11 was staged and the holocaust never happened! Thanks Oogieloves!
aech-02177
I don't know where to begin with this movie. I just don't. As a critic, I try to watch every movie I come across. As a critic, I don't discriminate films based on the target age demographic. As a critic, I only discriminate between good and bad movies. As a critic, I have seen the best and the worst in film. And what I have seen is the one the worst. The Oogieloves. I complain about movies like this all the time, and I get the same answer from almost everyone, "It's just for kids." No. That is not a legitimate excuse. I hear it all the time and I dismiss it every time. Just because something is for kids doesn't mean you shouldn't try to make it good. Let me point out the first problem with this movie. The Oogieloves are annoying as hell. They never shut up. They are always talking and jumping around. Loud and random is not funny. Second, the plot is just plain stupid. The Oogieloves go all over a sea of unfunny jokes and pointless celebrity cameos just to find a bunch of balloons that their idiot friend lost. The director of the movie was nominated for an Oscar for best documentary. Life is stupid. And finally, the movie is just awful. Simple as that. This movie is so bad that I found myself screaming at my TV, but not to help the Oogieloves. I was screaming for help. Why was this movie made? Why did Matthew Diamond direct this? Why does this movie have so many talented stars embarrassing themselves in front their fans? Why is this movie rated 6.5 on IMDb? Why? When I saw the poster for this, I thought it was some stupid, brainless CGI-animated kids film. Turns out to be a stupid, brainless live-action kids film with a bunch of people in radioactive Cabbage Patch Kids costumes with a Dora-type fourth wall break, which is somehow even worse than what I pictured. If I had kids, I wouldn't show this movie to them. If I was teaching film, I wouldn't even show this to a bunch of college kids to study what is wrong with kids entertainment. Just avoid this movie at all costs. There are better kids movies out there.
lemoneyes99
This movie has no redeeming qualities even worth discussing. I think the metacritic has it at 32/100 yet a number of reviews here gave it a 10/10! A 10? Does this movie look like it's a 10? Does this really seem like it's as good as classic kid's movie Toy Story? There are so many obvious fake reviews that I am offended by it. I just can't let this stand. Screw every person at the production company that participated in faking reviews. 34 of the positive reviews are 8 or higher. The clearly Fake Reviews also have similar wording. Keywords are also used like 'Plot Summary' and 'Character Description' Who the hell titles their reviews that way? And oddly, 2 reviews start with a number like 89. Or 28. Not numbers like a score but numbers as in a list. That is…unusual. The 30 of the 34 reviewers have only 1 review (for Oogieloves), no avatar, no poll responses, no ratings and no lists and no other activity since joining nearly 3 years ago. ALL 30 joined IMDb at the same time, June 2013 except two a few months later. And they all have plain simple user names with random number at the end. I Have encountered only ONE clearly LEGIT positive Review and the 3 remaining positive reviews are pretty clearly fake but if they are they are at least different from the other reviews.
