Steineded How sad is this?

Reptileenbu Did you people see the same film I saw?

SeeQuant Blending excellent reporting and strong storytelling, this is a disturbing film truly stranger than fiction

Staci Frederick Blistering performances.

tedg I watch these old mysteries not because I expect to find a good one. They rarely are, but often you can see a free art experimenting with different cinematic tricks while no one yet had a settled cinematic vocabulary. And here is a good one.This is a mystery about the murder of a ruthless radio reporter. We see the murder occur just as he is about to make an announcement that will ruin some innocent people. Oh, but wait. A few moments later we learn that what we have seen is a play, a play within the movie.In fact, the movie itself is an adaptation of a play. Essentially all the action occurs in a theater. To fully appreciate this, you need to know that the mystery genre made its leap from cheap paperbacks to movies via radio. That first scene where things slide effortlessly is not as sophisticated as say, The French Lieutenant's Woman. But it is more impressive for the time. As the story goes on, it becomes more ordinary, but I'll mark this opening as a milestone in a nesting vocabulary.

kevin olzak Universal's 1929 part-talkie "The Last Warning," the last film for director Paul Leni (1927's silent "The Cat and the Canary") was long thought to be a lost film, and while it remains superior to this 1939 remake, "The House of Fear," the latter need not lower its head in shame. Actor John Woodford (Donald Douglas) dies during his latest performance of the play "Dangerous Currents," in the very theatre named for Woodford himself. The police assume it's just a publicity stunt when the body disappears from Woodford's dressing room, and the case remains open for 2 years, with no solution and no corpse. Arthur McHugh (William Gargan), a detective posing as a Broadway producer, decides to bring together the original cast to repeat their performance of "Dangerous Currents," despite the rumors that the theatre is haunted by Woodford's ghost, who communicates with McHugh through a dead phone line. Also, there is one supremely eerie encounter with a spectre in the darkened theatre, and this too cannot be explained away, so there may actually be a genuine haunting. Both actresses stand out: lovely Irene Hervey (who starred in Lugosi's 1942 "Night Monster") plays Woodford's leading lady, and Dorothy Arnold (who co-starred with Lugosi in the 1939 serial "The Phantom Creeps") is the sluttish golddigger. Fast paced, many twists and turns, and consistently witty dialogue (especially Alan Dinehart); a vastly underrated Universal mystery which is too often confused with the studio's 1945 Sherlock Holmes release, plus its 'Crime Club' series, a total of 7 features that ran from 1937-1939. German director Joe May would follow this with "The Invisible Man Returns" and "The House of the Seven Gables," both 1940 releases featuring Vincent Price. "The House of Fear" made three appearances on Pittsburgh's Chiller Theater: March 22 1975 (between "The Ghost of Frankenstein" and "Horror Island"), Dec 17 1977 (following "Cult of the Cobra"), and July 2 1983 (solo).

Michael_Elliott House of Fear, The (1939) ** (out of 4) Lazy, routine and by the numbers remake of The Last Warning from Universal. The story is pretty much the same as an actor gets murdered during a performance and then years later the cast is brought back together to try and trap the killer. This certainly sinks to the "C" level in Universal's library and it comes off very lazy compared to the original film. Several scenes are redone here but they don't come off nearly as good as the original film. The cast is also rather boring and bland but the 67-minute running time does go by fast.

Norm-30 An actor, John Woodford, dies on-stage during a performance of a play. His body is taken to his dressing room, where it disappears. The theatre is closed for over a year, and rumors that Woodford's ghost haunts it spread all over Broadway.A detective (posing as a producer) rents the theatre and attempts to present the same play, but all sorts of "ghostly occurences" happen to try to thwart his plans. (Woodford's voice coming over a dead telephone, his face appearing on the pitch-dark stage during a police vigil, more murders, mysterious notes from the "dead man", etc).All-in-all, a "different" mystery with good acting; if you watch the film intently, you can figure out who the murderer is (but, it's DIFFICULT!). Highly recommended. (btw....this film has NOTHING to do with the Sherlock Holmes film of the same name).