The Far Pavilions
The Far Pavilions
PG | 21 April 1984 (USA)
The Far Pavilions Trailers

Story of forbidden love in 1800's India set against the revolution for India's freedom from England.

Reviews
Mischa Redfern I didn’t really have many expectations going into the movie (good or bad), but I actually really enjoyed it. I really liked the characters and the banter between them.
Rio Hayward All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.
Adeel Hail Unshakable, witty and deeply felt, the film will be paying emotional dividends for a long, long time.
Ginger Very good movie overall, highly recommended. Most of the negative reviews don't have any merit and are all pollitically based. Give this movie a chance at least, and it might give you a different perspective.
Pandelis This mini series was an unexpected eye candy one summer, for the lazy Sunday afternoons when we didn't expect something special to be broadcasted.I was fascinated with the fairytale-like story and the wind of adventure blown into it. Amy Irving was (as always) likable but I found Ben Cross too stoic and a bit cold. Omar Sharif brought an air of nobleness to an otherwise cruel environment.The most breathtaking scene was the suttee ceremony that haunted me for weeks after. Even though I know now that some women did it voluntary, it is the cruelest custom I ever heard...
muzzi_123 This miniseries came hot on the heels of 'The Jewel in the Crown', 'A Passage to India' and a fascination with all things Indian.Ash (played by Ben Cross, best known for 'Chariots of Fire') and Wally (played by Benedict Taylor, who had featured in children's TV series 'Barriers') were the main players in this drama. Ash had been brought up to think of himself as Indian rather than officer class, and so falls in love with the sultry Anjuli (played by Amy Irving, at that time I think Mrs Steven Spielberg).it was not a bad plot and had some brilliant dialogs i would say good acting overall
vladitoapd I agree with the previous comment. When the miniseries aired, I was dating an Indian girl, and with her whole family we would watch every episode. I read the book years later, and was impressed at how accurately the miniseries followed the book. When it came out on video, it had been years since I saw the original, but I knew something was missing. I hope it is re-released in its entire length.While it is hard to believe Amy Irving as an Indian princess, the acting is superb, the sets are magnificent and the camera work captures it all. This set a standard for TV-miniseries that has never been equaled.
Vash2001 The Far pavilions is based on M.M.Kaye's book 'The far pavilions'. It is a good but not completely faithful adaptation of a 1200 page novel condensed into a 5-hour miniseries, on a two-disk set.It is a visual feast depicting the British period in India, in the 19th century. The central character Ashton/Ash Pelham-Martyn spends first 11 years of his life in India, as an Indian (Ashok), after his birth parents who are British, are dead. Upon his return to India (from England), as a member of the British Army, Ash meets again the love of his life- Princess Anjuli- who was his childhood friend. She is about to be married to an old man who is a ruler of a princely state (Bhithor) in India. Anjuli is doing this only to help her younger sister, while sacrificing her own love. Anjuli, a Rajput woman with one-fourth Russian blood in her, would keep her word even though it means sacrificing her love for Ash/Ashok. While narrating their struggle against a society that strongly believed in caste and race, the movie paints a picture of the British and the Indians in that period of history quite well. The art direction, background music, and cinematography are excellent, showing the richness of the land. Many scenes were filmed in Rajasthan, a western state, that is rich in history of its people. The snow capped peaks of the Himalyas are lovely.Ben Cross does a superb job of expressing the inner struggle of Ash (Ashok/Ashton) as "two persons in one body" and the passionate but disappointed lover of the princess Anjuli. Amy Irving succeeds in showing the quiet strength, pride and sadness of Anjuli. Many well known actors have added to the characters- Christopher Lee as Rao Saheb (the uncle of the two princesses), Omar Sheriff as Koda Dad- the horse expert, and others.Where the movie/miniseries comes up short is toward the end.SPOILERS AHEAD...........About three fourth of the miniseries stays faithful to the book. However, the last 300 pages have been condensed considerably, and the events are shown in a different order. The fight in Afghanistan and the death of Wally Hamilton (and others) takes place earlier in the movie.In the book Anjuli, after escape from Bhithor, goes through a period of recovery. She has been emaciated due to starvation and torture. There are few signs of this in her appearance when she escapes Bhithor with Ash and his companions. In the book Ash marries her on a boat, because no one would perform religious rights for them. Although married, it is too dangerous for them to openly live as a couple. They eventually decide to move to a valley in the Himalayas -their Far Pavilions. The miniseries ends after escape from Bhithor, when Ash and Anjuli are finally together for good. Some of the earlier scenes (the wedding, the Suttee ceremony) are long drawn out. They could have been shortened to include the rest of the story, in its original order (the Afghan war takes place after the escape from Bhithor in the book).I had a problem with making Koda Dad such a major character in the movie. In the book, although an important influence on young Ash, he was not on that trip to Bhithor. He had long retired. Including him took away from some of the other characters like Sarji and Ash's favorite horse Dagobaz. The first disk is much more entertaining and more faithful to the book than the second one.The end in the miniseries seems sudden, compared to the slowness of earlier parts, and has less impact than in the book, which takes the time to show the struggles and strengths of the two main characters.Other than that, this is a good adaptation of the book. It fits in the 'movie' format. I like the book better for its details, but the movie is a feast for the eyes. It created in me the desire to read more about this period in history. Definitely recommended.