London
London
R | 10 February 2006 (USA)
London Trailers

London is a drug laden adventure that centers on a party in a New York loft where a young man is trying to win back his ex-girlfriend.

Reviews
Diagonaldi Very well executed
Dotbankey A lot of fun.
Cassandra Story: It's very simple but honestly that is fine.
Fulke Great example of an old-fashioned, pure-at-heart escapist event movie that doesn't pretend to be anything that it's not and has boat loads of fun being its own ludicrous self.
little.thorn The cast recognised as great characters in top box office movies are implementing themselves in their roles in this movie brilliantly. Love it! Watched it again and again and I see different angles every time. One of the most underrated movies I've seen x
janne-85458 Actually I found myself in that movie. This movie emerges so much what people are out there. Unfortunately this is very underrated movie. Movie where actors really acts and original Statham have real words to say. So pure love, drugs and alcohol. I just find this entertaining after four years study in one year as a start of holiday. This fits me. Recommended 100%!
MBunge At some point in its creative gestation, even if only briefly, London had to have been conceived as a stage play. I mean, 80% of the story takes place inside a gigantic bathroom and 99% of it is people blathering on about the sort of thing you blather on about when it's very late and you've had to much to drink or snort. The other 1% is waiting to see if Jessica Biel gets completely nude.Syd (Chris Evans) is an aimless druggie who decides to crash the going away party of his ex-girlfriend London (Jessica Biel). He drags with him Bateman (Jason Statham), a currency trader who's twice as old and twice as f'd up as Syd, and the two of them hang out in the bathroom, doing line after line of cocaine and spilling their guts to each other. A couple of hot chicks (Kelli Garner and Joy Bryant) wander into the john to break up the monotony and there's a series of flashbacks to when Syd and London were still together. It all builds up to Syd finally leaving the toilet behind and confronting London, who initially blows him off like an icy bitch but then flees the party with him, only to have one of those "realistic" endings where they don't actually get back together and the audience is supposed to wallow in the pedestrian tragedy of it all.Amidst all the verbal diarrhea, this film does make it perfectly clear why Syd and London broke up. It's because Syd is an insecure, immature and altogether intolerable dickhead. Why they got together or stayed together is a riddle. Why the viewer should give two craps about Syd's misery after the break up or have any sympathy with his desperate desire to get London back is an mystery. Why London bothers to give Syd the time of day at the party, let alone run away with him and give him a goodbye boink, is an enigma. Syd is a thoroughly uninteresting and unappealing jagoff, which pretty much cripples this motion picture on every level.Jason Statham nearly performs a faith healing on the film to make it almost watchable and not just because he's got hair in this thing. Not only is Bateman more screwed up than Syd, he understands his problems and demonstrates an effort to try and control them. Bateman is a man and is made even manlier by contrast with to the juvenile Syd. The, by far, best scene in the film is when Bateman narrates a flashback about his trip to an sadomasochistic sex club. It's not just because it's such a relief to see something visually provocative after people standing and yammering at each other, but also because Bateman's narration shows him to be grappling with his emotions and compulsions. The second best scene is when he rages at Syd over what ruined Bateman's marriage. Bateman's torment blows all of Syd's self-indulgent suffering out of the water and even the movie seems to understand that. Writer/director Hunter Richards totally recognizes that Bateman is a man and Syd is a boy, but still decides to focus on the boy. I don't know how he wrote this script without appreciating that Bateman was the best character in it and I can only imagine he finally realized it when he tried to edit it all together and saw the only two legitimately good scenes in the whole thing were completely centered on Bateman.Now, if you like films where people just talk and talk and talk, alternating between soul baring revelations and airy BS like the kind you get from college freshmen after their first philosophy class, you might still enjoy London. If you want a movie that moves and a main character who doesn't make you want to poke his eyes out, you should probably give this one a pass.And just in case you're wondering, Biel does not get completely nude, so there goes that 1%.
davek28 The great thing about this film is that I could easily fast forward through the sections where Chris Evans is throwing a hissy fit or just ranting inanely about the meaning of life.The bad thing is that I had to put up with the always intensely irritating Chris Evans in order to look at the lovely Jessica Biel, the amazingly cute and sexy Kelli Garner and the outrageously luscious Joy Bryant.So these people all have loadsa money and spend their time snorting coke and drinking and smoking various substances. London used to have this thing with Syd, though God knows why as he's unhinged and should be on prescription drugs and/or at anger management sessions. I had the worst feeling that she might actually abandon the flight and go back to Syd at the end. That would have been a nightmare. Isn't Syd with a 'Y' a girl's name? So four out of ten for this piece of garbage. One point each for the ladies and one for the pretty bathroom. Never did like Jason Statham as he reminds me of dire British gangster flicks. I've always disliked Chris Evans and I still do. I'd have a drink to calm down from watching this cack but I'd then be as bad as them.Rant over.