House of Numbers: Anatomy of an Epidemic
House of Numbers: Anatomy of an Epidemic
| 19 April 2009 (USA)
House of Numbers: Anatomy of an Epidemic Trailers

In House of Numbers: Anatomy of an Epidemic, an AIDS film like no other, the HIV/AIDS story is being rewritten. This is the first film to present the uncensored POVs of virtually all the major players; in their own settings, in their own words. It rocks the foundation upon which all conventional wisdom regarding HIV/AIDS is based. House of Numbers could well be the opening volley in a battle to bring sanity and clarity to an epidemic gone awry.

Reviews
SunnyHello Nice effects though.
ReaderKenka Let's be realistic.
ChicDragon It's a mild crowd pleaser for people who are exhausted by blockbusters.
Helllins It is both painfully honest and laugh-out-loud funny at the same time.
covefe This is urgent, if you have HIV/AIDS go to the doctor quick and get treated! Still don't believe me and want to brush my review off, then listen. In this documentary a girl named Christine Maggiore is interviewed and used as a talking point. She made her and her child not go any treatment of HIV, and unfortunately they both died. Of HIV related diseases. If you still don't believe me, then fine in the documentary they talk about the South African leader Thabo Mbeki who worked with HIV denialists and then started working to stop HIV treatment in South Africa, and when all treatment stopped things happened. Of course in the documentary they don't tell you what happened, but what happened was over 300,000 people died of HIV related deaths. In conclusion, this documentary promotes people killing themselves and has proven deadly. And if you don't believe it, then don't believe it, but I have a few questions and this will close out my argument: If someone made a movie denying cancer, saying that it had nothing to do with the deaths and was all made up. Then how would you feel? Would you believe it? Would you tell others or force others to follow this cancer denying documentary? And last of all, Would you follow it if you got told you had cancer? Thank you good night.
Seymour Asses This documentary is a waste of time for those who watch it and those who made it. All the "evidence" in this movie is either outdated, twisted out of context, or false.The most hysterical part is the beginning where the director says he has lots of questions about aids and is going on a journey to uncover the truth. It's obvious he is already a hardcore AIDS denier and only intends to present this point of view, no matter how illogical.I have a very open mind, and am an admitted conspiracy theorist. However, disproven conspiracies, such as this one, with no factual basis, are not worth learning about.Dear Mr. Director, if you really don't think the AIDS virus exists then why not just infect yourself and document your life for a few years? If it's as harmless as you say then you have nothing to worry about.
chollygee Brent Leung has produced a masterful film. In just 85 minutes,House of Numbers reveals the double-talk, inept science, fabricated statistics, heinously poisonous drugs, meaningless "HIV" tests, and lurid insinuations about African sexuality that are staples of the HIV-causes- AIDS orthodoxy.It is an infuriating expose of the well-coiffed, lavishly paid, arrogant but ever-defensive clowns whose careers and bank accounts have benefited so handsomely from promoting a flawed and deceptive set of theories about what is making people sick, especially in Africa.The edginess and sarcasm we see from such leading AIDS "luminaries" as Robert Gallo, David Baltimore, Anthony Fauci, John P. Moore, and Nancy Padian confirms anew that their vaunted "house of numbers" is a shabby, squalid edifice of ill-repute.Be sure to watch the calm, careful, and accurate comments by Liam Scheff, Rian Malan, Neville Hodgkinson and Christian Fiala in the film.You will then quickly realize why the dogmatists of the HIV/AIDS orthodoxy are trembling with righteous rage and indignation at the film. And with good reason - it shows that those faux emperors of the HIV/AIDS establishment have no clothes!Congrats to Brent Leung for producing a superb piece of icon-smashing and truth-telling cinema that has already garnered numerous awards at film festivals.
Clark Baker As a criminal investigator with thirty years of experience, I was extremely impressed by House of Numbers.In under 90 minutes, the director allowed the subjects tell their stories without getting in the way, allowing his audience to make up their own minds without putting them to sleep.What results is a breathtaking and heart-wrenching expose of scientific corruption not seen since Pope Urban's condemnation of Galileo. Like a slow moving train wreck, House of Numbers allows the grand dragons of HIV to indict themselves for profit-driven crimes directed at young mothers, homosexuals, minorities and third world victims throughout the world with the same detachment that made Eli Weisel's NIGHT so powerful.In short, Mr. Leung does for AIDS what Jeffrey Wigand did for Tobacco - the difference being that Wigand was an insider and Leung a thoughtful bystander.By any investigative standard, Mr. Leung's film is a remarkable and important achievement – a MUST-SEE for anyone who cares about scientific integrity and healthcare.Clark Baker LAPD retired