Plantiana Yawn. Poorly Filmed Snooze Fest.

LouHomey From my favorite movies..

Kailansorac Clever, believable, and super fun to watch. It totally has replay value.

Catangro After playing with our expectations, this turns out to be a very different sort of film.

ackstasis 'His Trust (1911)' was always going to prove difficult for modern audiences, particularly with D.W. Griffith's reputation. Events can take on entirely different connotations when the viewer is consciously watching out for hints of racial prejudice. For example, when a white servant rescues the family of his employer, it's viewed as noble devotion to his fellow man; yet when a black man does it (or, more accurately, a white man in black-face), many simply consider it racist propaganda, or showing support for slavery. I think that this is a grossly superficial stance. Setting aside the rather ridiculous spectacle of white men performing in black-face, I thought that Griffith portrayed George (played by Wilfred Lucas), the trusted African-American servant of a Confederate soldier (Dell Henderson), with sympathy and humility. There's obviously a common bond between George and Col. Frazier, a mutual trust that overcomes racial boundaries. George does not rescue Frazier's daughter and memorial sword because he's a blindly-devoted slave, but because he's a human being, and that's what any decent human being would do.'His Trust' was one of several Civil War shorts that Griffith directed, and it was shortly thereafter followed by a sequel, 'His Trust Fulfilled (1911),' which I haven't yet seen. 'In the Border States (1910)' is easily the better effort, mostly because it humanised both sides of the conflict, whereas here the despicable Yankees arrive only to loot a fallen soldier's home and burn it to the ground. Nevertheless, Griffit manages to build up a fair amount of pathos, particularly as Col. Frazier's wife (Claire McDowell), daughter by her side, turns to face the smouldering shell of her house, as its charred foundations tumble to the ground. An early Civil War battle scene emphasises the chaos of warfare, with smoke and gunfire battering the screen at random intervals, and Griffith underplays the deaths of soldiers left, right and centre, as though acknowledging the turmoil of combat. This isn't one of the director's finest hours, but it's a worthy enough Civil War tale, and, if you leave your racial preconceptions at the door, there's plenty to appreciate.

ccthemovieman-1 In this story, Negro servant "George" is asked to look after his master's wife and child when he ("Colonel Frazier") goes off to war. Soon, the master is killed in the Civil War. It's bad enough the man died, but then the heartless Yankees came and looted the house and burned it down. George goes into the fire and retrieves the small child and the Frazier's sword - a sentimental piece offered to his wife after her husband's death. George, the woman and child - all homeless - then find a shack and poor George has to sleep outside. End of story.Wilfred Lucas played "George;" Dell Henderson, "Col. Frazier" and Claire McDonald played Frazier's wife. She had a very square face that reminded me a bit of Demi Moore. For a film made in 1911, I thought the battle scenes were pretty good and were probably considered "big production" at that time.I know the obvious flaw of having all white actors play the black people will turn off a lot of viewers but that's the way it was for the first three decades or so in film-making, and you just accept it as a "product of its time." Otherwise, this was a decent little drama for when it was made and that ending, with George curling up on the front steps to sleep, was very powerful, I thought.

MartinHafer This short film combined with his epic BIRTH OF A NATION is definitive proof that D. W. Griffith had both contempt for Black people and believed strongly in the myth that the "Old South" was paradise for the slaves! The film begins with the Master going off to war and all the slaves crying and wishing him luck (in real life, they probably would have cheered--hoping he'd get his head blown off!). But, as luck would have it, the man soon is pushing up the daisies (that's DEAD to all you who don't understand American slang). His sword is the only thing that returns home. A bit later, the house with the sword catches fire and a devoted slave not only saves the little White girl, but returns to rescue the sword! Then, at then end, he houses the girl and her mom in his shack (a mansion compared to most real slave quarters) and sleeps outside like some sort of devoted dog. Oh, and did I mention that all the Black actors were really White folks in dark makeup?! While I must admit that Griffith made some great films and was very, very important to the early film industry, there must be a lot of people who would love to know he's burning in Hell for his depiction of Black Americans!! This film is important historically and probably should be seen by teens to know just how far we have come.

Snow Leopard This D.W. Griffith short feature, the first of a two-film series, has some good technical aspects, but the story and characters are a bit too labored and contrived to be fully convincing. The content is a combination of two themes that Griffith seems to have considered important, namely, the society of the Pre-War South, and the concept of someone fulfilling a trust despite all obstacles.Although the story becomes too exaggerated to work very well, it does start out with a worthwhile idea, with a father heading off to fight in the War, and entrusting the safety of his wife and daughter to a valued servant. It's the kind of experience that immediately evokes sympathy even from those who have not faced it.Further, the large-scale scenes, such as the parade and the battle, are done quite well, especially considering the limitations of the era. One problem, though, comes into play with the portrayal of the slaves. There is no doubt that they were intended as sympathetic characters, but they also reflect Griffith's own idealized views, and as a result the portrayals are not convincing.The story, which continues in "His Trust Fulfilled", has a handful of compelling moments, but it just never feels as if it has reached its potential.