Spidersecu Don't Believe the Hype

mraculeated The biggest problem with this movie is it’s a little better than you think it might be, which somehow makes it worse. As in, it takes itself a bit too seriously, which makes most of the movie feel kind of dull.

Joanna Mccarty Amazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.

Zandra The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.

rachellehallett I loved this movie! For the dreamy quality, the camera work was amazing, would have been too stilted if it was kept still for every shot. Love is not still it is always slightly off kilter! Hazy in places and a few reality checks of cringe worthy moments. Starts of slow, which makes the viewer sit back and relax, desperately waiting to see what happens - will they find love? Won't they? Not sure where it will take you. Gorgeous dreamy music and subtle humour woven through it. Beautiful little film for a lazy afternoon. Well worth the watch. Duntons films seem to have a thread of red always running through them - a theme occurring? or just coincidence.

Luke Hobson this a beautiful film. i don't understand a previous review rubbishing the film saying it was badly made? when "a bout de soufflé" came out a lot of people thought it was badly made and had too many jump cuts and now it's considered a classic. since Richard Linklater reinvented the conventions of modern male/female romance's with "before sunrise" there have been several films with similar feels to them as this, most recently Miranda July's "Me and you and everyone we know". this film is almost like anti-Hollywood film making.everything looks natural and some of the shots are very beautiful, almost like a visual poem if you will. the mix of editing styles and music in this film(it has a beautiful soundtrack from Icelandic ambient band Mum) make this film very dream like. and the film is very short( around 70 minutes i remember) witch is a perfect length as it's neither too short nor too long.it reminded me of leaving las vegas at some points(i don't know why though) and it's very reminiscent of some the early works of one of my favourite directors Hal Hartley (amature,trust, unbelievable truth). in short if your looking for a film that looks nice,sounds nice, and has meaning behind then i highly recommend it. i mean i've never written a review before but considering my distaste for a previous review i feel justice needs to be served in the name of true art.

dirtyharry67 miss dunton: next time before you attempt to make a movie you should learn your craft FIRST!i really wanted to like this movie. i like romances and i liked the basic premise of the story. i also liked the actors. but this movie was unwatchable. why? because the technical people involved don't seem to know the first thing about their craft. the lightning was bad. really bad. the editing was a mess. the camera"work" was the worst of it all! there is hardly a steady shot in this movie. heads are cut off. the camera is constantly moving - up, down, left, right. without any reason. almost as if the cameraperson had attention deficit disorder or was on cold turkey or something. it was unbelievable. so bad in fact that i was not able to watch the entire movie (which is short enough - 71min). i could take only 20 min of this.again: i would have really liked to know how the story continued because i liked it. i simply could not bare the technical execution, especially the unbelievably nervous camera work. what were these people thinking??