Elvis Meets Nixon
Elvis Meets Nixon
PG-13 | 12 August 1997 (USA)
Elvis Meets Nixon Trailers

A "mockumentary" about Elvis's real-life trip to the White House to become a federal marshal under the DEA

Reviews
KnotMissPriceless Why so much hype?
ReaderKenka Let's be realistic.
Siflutter It's easily one of the freshest, sharpest and most enjoyable films of this year.
Sienna-Rose Mclaughlin The movie really just wants to entertain people.
un_samourai First off, don't expect anything super authentic. This is an imagining of what Elvis might have done on his way to meet Nixon. The actor that plays Elvis doesn't do the best imitation that I've seen by any stretch of the imagination, but he captures the narcissism, and swagger of Presley very well. It's fun to watch him interact with normal people without his handlers around. I liked the scenes that stressed how far removed from the reality of the sixties that Elvis was, being that he hated the hippies, the Viet Nam protesters, and the Beatles (who stole his thunder).A good laugh is also when you get to see Nixon's enemies list. Definitely give it a go if you see it aired, I've seen it twice, and it really has a charm to it.
John Wayne Peel I admit I'm a sucker for movies with the real people being portrayed, especially when Elvis is one of the main characters. This is a very funny movie that purports to be factual, and yet the liberties are many, but since it a comedy really, I can excuse that. It's in all the reviews I've read so far, the one inconsistency that no one caught (and I really being picky here but I feel I have to mention it) and that is that Elvis drinks a Coke when he preferred Pepsi. This would probably simply product placement and nothing more. I mentioned it because I am a dedicated Coke drinker. But anyway, the way the two principals act is meant to be exaggerated. Certainly, Elvis wasn't quite so cloddish, but knowing what I know about Nixon, I don't think they were too far off the mark there. The lead, Rick Peters, does a very good impersonation of the KING, and I'm also a sucker for good impersonations, doing a few of them myself. I just wish I were half as good at doing Elvis, but this guy looks more like him that I ever could even if he isn't a dead ringer for the King. Perhaps the coolest thing about this movie are the real people whose comments appear in different parts of the film. People like Dick Cavett, Wayne Newton and Tony Curtis. My only problem with the movie is Elvis swearing.so much. I don't believe he did this so.frequently. It's worth checking out.
billymac72 This movie kicks butt! Believe it or not, it may be the closest thing to portraying a `real' Elvis than has ever been made. And while Peters doesn't strike one as particularly Elvis-ish at first glance, he certainly nails the mannerisms cold and even DOES look creepily like the King in several shots (just check out the sly grin he flashes after handing out Christmas gifts to the Memphis Mob boys).Let's face it. Elvis was one strange, eccentric dude.I guess that's what makes him so fascinating. To know that about him is to love him. And to be a fan means that you know how blown out of proportion his image has become. The closest representation we have of the actual man existing beneath the cape is the two painstakingly researched Gurlaick (yeah, I think I misspelled it) bios. But this movie, however, comes awfully close I think. And, as an added bonus, it's definitely light-hearted and fun, which was certainly a large part of Elvis' character.The main drawback is certainly not the MINOR liberties taken with the facts per se (again - unbelievable - this story seems to be mostly true!), but the inclusion of the hippy run-ins on Sunset in LA. The flower kids in the record/head shop are sooooo stereotypical, and the one who has the sit-down with E in coffee shop has nothing but afterschool-special-you're-my-inpiration-type pap to lay on us. The only consolation is that Our Man doesn't fulfill his request to show up at his love-in protest or whatever (my boy, my boy!) These scenes I believe were well intended in their function to demonstrate how out of touch Elvis was with the real world, and could've been a great comedic culture clash but they, alas, are full of corn.
gazzo-2 Boys was this lame. Now, I admit I am an Elvis fan, and kinda like Nixon the foreign policy guy-but also I enjoy the Johnny Bravo-style Elvis sendups and like-minded Tricky Dick satires you see( as in the Nixon-voice as commentator on Imus)-No problem here.But this...this was pretty poor as far as it went. They guy doing Nixon looked more like a bad Ed Sullivan, and the guy doing Elvis-was loads more like DON Johnson's stab at the King from that really bad '81 TV flick DJ did back when. Watching this was like seeing an over-extended Saturday Night Live skit on the meeting, stretched out to 90 minutes or more.Somehow I don't that Elvis was quite That cloddish, and Nixon, had a little more on the ball than THAT. Now, John and Yoko showing up at the white-house from their Bed-in for Peace days-now THAT woulda been funny...** outta ****, LAME.