ChicDragon It's a mild crowd pleaser for people who are exhausted by blockbusters.

Myron Clemons A film of deceptively outspoken contemporary relevance, this is cinema at its most alert, alarming and alive.

Billie Morin This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows

Juana what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.

adonis98-743-186503 Rayne fights against the Nazis in Europe during World War II, encountering Ekart Brand, a Nazi leader whose target is to inject Adolf Hitler with Rayne's blood in an attempt to transform him into a dhampir and attain immortality. Despite the beautiful Natassia Malthe in the title role the combination of Nazis, Vampires and Action doesn't fit well and unlike the first fim that was so bad it's good this 3rd and final installment is a low budget film from the worst director of all time and one that doesn't work at all. (3/10)

iamwhitewica First of all, we are VERY FAR from Bloodrayne, this is more a personal fantasy movie created for the author and no one else...well maybe teenagers in search of cheap, sleazy sex scene.A lot of the movie is spent showing you the actress body's and people abusing it many ways. This could actually be a soft-porn movie more than a horror flick. The only horror I saw is 2 people stuck on a train in route to Berlin to be killed publicly in front of Hitler; but they have time to f..k on the train! Of course, I don't want to die without f...ing a last time! (This is the trend since the 90's, put useless sex in any movie or situation so that teenagers (and perverts) can masturbate and rate your movie well, nothing to do with talents!)Anyway, if you like Bloodrayne; stick to the first and only real movie. The 2 other ones are really dumb and boring. Except if you want to jack off on cheap flicks.Time waster and surely an income deduction, nothing cinematographic about this "thing".

KentaroK They are movies that are bad because they lack budget or a skilled director, or bad actors, or interference from some sort of production complication.However, this movie is bad because so many major things were done badly, and so many major things were done to the highest quality. For example, the costumes and sets show careful attention to detail. Several of the minor actions are convincing, and the writing shows enough consistency to be competent and air-tight. This all shows that they had the budget, talent, and capability to make this whole thing entertaining.Yet, it isn't. The same writers and actors who have the capability to tell a compelling story, just give up halfway between concept and execution. Many lines sound as if someone just read them for the first time, straight off of a page, and many scenes feel like they are acted out by amateurs who haven't read the script, and thus, don't know what their character should be feeling.That is all very sad, because there was potential to make this as great as "Hot Fuzz" and other sleeper hits, if not in popularity, at least in passion.The thing is, by any summary, this movie seems like it would be good. Even as I have just watched it, I can't really convey how bad it is, or why it is bad. It has all of the components to be a great, or at least, good enough, movie: some good acting, some interesting plot points, some great attention to detail. Those components should make for a good movie, but this just is not. Any random still shot looks interesting, and any five-second clip or trailer you might make would hint at a movie worth watching.However, this just... isn't that. If there is a comic book adaptation, then it might be better (and I'm not into comics), because at least then, your imagination would make the summary into a good memory... it is sad when people have the tools, but just fail to use them.I don't know why. Maybe they were depressed due to the housing crisis.Just skip this, watch anything else, or read a book. Or do what I should have done: read the summary, then imagine who good and fun that would be as a movie. You'll make better memories.Also, this is two hours long. The extra half an hour (over the typical 90 minutes) only adds the the pain, disappointment, and annoyance.

Claudio Carvalho In the World War II, the Damphir Rayne (Natassia Malthe) fights against Nazis and joins the resistance lead by Nathaniel Gregor (Brendan Fletcher). When they attack a train expecting to find weapons, they find people that are going to concentration camp.Rayne is shot by a soldier and her blood drops on the face of Commandant Ekart Brand (Michael Paré ). She kills him but he turns into a powerful vampire. Now Rayne need to fix the problem, otherwise Hitler may achieve her power with the research of Doctor Mangler (Clint Howard)."Bloodrayne: The Third Reich" is a low budget movie by Uwe Boll with the combination of vampires, Nazis and eroticism that does not work well. The body of the sexy Natassia Malthe is exposed in a silly exploitation. My vote is four.Title (Brazil): "Bloodrayne: O Terceiro Reich" ("Bloodrayne: The Third Reich")