Beyond the Wall of Sleep
Beyond the Wall of Sleep
R | 06 June 2006 (USA)
Beyond the Wall of Sleep Trailers

Joe Slaader is a mysterious mountain man being held in the Ulster County Asylum after the brutal murder of his family. Edward Eischel, a young intern, sees something more than just an inbred monster in this new inmate, however. Instead, he sees him as the harbinger of some greater and much darker force. With bodies piling up, his job in jeopardy, and his sanity hanging in the balance he gives in to his obsession with tapping into Joe's hidden power, risking all that he has along the way.

Reviews
Interesteg What makes it different from others?
Marketic It's no definitive masterpiece but it's damn close.
Livestonth I am only giving this movie a 1 for the great cast, though I can't imagine what any of them were thinking. This movie was horrible
mraculeated The biggest problem with this movie is it’s a little better than you think it might be, which somehow makes it worse. As in, it takes itself a bit too seriously, which makes most of the movie feel kind of dull.
Paul Magne Haakonsen Alright, with this having been released upon the world and mankind, I am sure that H.P. Lovecraft is turning over in his grave. Now, I am a huge fan of Lovecraft's writing and his work, and truth be told then there are a bunch of good movie available that are based more or less on his work. But of course, not everything can be good. And this 2006 version of "Beyond the Wall of Sleep" is definitely far from good.First of all, the movie is plagued by an endless stream of flashing imagines in a very distorted and disorganized manner. Sure the idea must have seemed nice, to introduce a sense of madness with these images, but it just didn't work. It these flashing images did anything, it would have been annoying you senseless and making you irritable. It got to the point where I got up and turned off the movie.And the acting in the movie didn't exactly help bring any justice to this visual rape of Lovecraft's epic classic tale. The acting in the movie was like watching a staged scene of amateur theater. It was forced, unemotional, over the top, and just a pain to behold. Everybody, save a couple of people, in the movie was really, really bad in their acting. And that made the movie even more unbearable to look at (as if the constant annoying flashing images wasn't enough).The flickering and switching between black and white to color did nothing to help the movie along either. Either stick with black and white or go in full color. It just ended up making the movie come off as a crappier production.I was genuinely disappointed when I made it just over halfway through the movie. This is to the point where I simply gave up on the movie, because the acting was bad, the production was bad, the Lovecraft-feeling was non-existing in the movie. It just failed on all levels.For fans of Lovecraft, then stay well clear of the 2006 version of "Beyond the Wall of Sleep", because it is like watching paint drying on a wall; uneventful and dull.
Jesse J Despite the absolutely atrocious acting in this film, the way it was told and visualized was pretty amazing, and very true to the Lovecraft story it came from. The effects used were low budget but still oddly impressive, and for a low budget film I thought it was pretty damn good overall. Yes, the pacing was very slow. Yes, the acting was below amateurish, even downright awful a lot of the time. Yes, the camera angles were below even the quality of a television reality program. However, it was still a brilliantly visualized film, especially the 'backstory' scene and the summoning scene. Overall, it was below what I personally would have preferred in a film based on a Lovecraft story, but I still thought it came to a fantastically visualized, mind blowing conclusion.
electronicoffee I love horror movies; I love even BAD horror movies.I've only said this about two movies before (see title of post) but this movie is F(_)CKING UNWATCHABLE. I literally had to FWD scenes on my DVD player just to get through (yes, just to skim) the movie. It made me want to open my eye with a socket wrench.My freshman semester of college (intro to video) work was better. I was totally fooled by the cover of the video, whoever did that cover was an AMAZING work of art :D But the movie is nothing like it.More than a waste of money, this was a waste of time, and effort. I could say more, but it would be just wasting even more time.
mrush I hate a DVD box that has a cool looking scary creature on it and then you rent it and the movie turns out to be a piece of crap.This was one of those movies.I hated this movie.It was one of the worst pieces of garbage I've ever watched.I'm not really sure what the movie was about.As near as I can tell it took place in the early 1900's in an insane asylum.A patient is brought in that has a weird deformity on his back and a young intern who is doing weird experiments on patients in the basement starts experimenting on the deformed patient and that leads to chaos and havoc and death at the asylum.And also there was something about evil things happening when the patient slept and maybe a demon was living in the hump on his back.I dunno.This movie was terrible.It had bad acting,really really bad acting.And horrible writing and all during the movie there were the same pictures of dark woods and bloody meat and little kids running around flashing on the screen over and over.I don't know what it meant nor do I care.Rarely have I seen a movie that was so completely worthless and plot less and pointless as this mess.I hate everyone who had anything to do with this movie.May not a single one of them ever work in the entertainment industry again.I gave this movie a 1 only because the rating system doesn't go any lower.