Lovesusti The Worst Film Ever

SoftInloveRox Horrible, fascist and poorly acted

ChicRawIdol A brilliant film that helped define a genre

Aubrey Hackett While it is a pity that the story wasn't told with more visual finesse, this is trivial compared to our real-world problems. It takes a good movie to put that into perspective.

Tofig There is a usual disappointment when someone reads an ingenious work of a writer and watches the film of it after even though the screenplay is written by the writer. You feel it in this one too. Mise-en-scene and cinematography is proper, however acting of some of the actors might be much better especially the main interesting character Fandorin had to have the best acting but unfortunately he has not. The music was missing in some parts of the movie. There should have been less cuts. And the important moments should have been emphasized. Overall it is a very interesting detective to watch, but it could have been done better by Aleksandr Abadashyan.

acheron-4 Based on Boris Akunin's novel 'Azazel' (English title 'The Winter Queen') set in Moscow in 1876. The novel started a long series quite popular in Russia.In 'Azazel' a young police officer - Erast Fandorin - investigates an odd suicide of some rich young man and finds a complex conspiracy, trying to take over most European countries - from Britain to Ottoman Empire - with the best intentions, of course. That may sound like a cliché, but the author made it all look and feel quite realistic, believable and compelling.The book was excellent. The script is good. One may argue that it follows the book too closely, and the film is too long. Fandorin is nothing like I imagined him, but this way he is closer to the book, so I can live with it. The actors play well. However they don't seem to agree on the exact genre: comedy, tragedy, drama, farce, detective, action or something else. That ruins otherwise good film.The biggest disappointment were the "bad guys" - especially the leader and the "mole". In the book it is possible to deduce the former fairly early, but the latter stays a mystery almost until the end. Here their intentions become obvious in a minute after they appear.

job4r2000 the book might be good, but the movie is quite disappointing.the acting is really bad. especially the main character is really annoying. since the movie was too long, there was almost no suspense for a detective story. sometimes it looks like a comedy, but unfortunately a bad one. the story is quite predictable. all in all, it is a waste of time. if you want to see a well done russian detective story, watch the old episodes of "adventures of sherlock homes".

blef1248 The book is excellent, no question, but, unfortunately, the movie is not as good. Noskov's (Fandorin) acting is not convincing and his voice sounds really strange at times. Brilling is a typical Andrey Mironov type, and it looks like Bezrukov tries to imitate his acting. The best of all is Neelova (Lady Ester): her acting is way above everybody else's. Overall, the movie feels a little bit raw, as if made in a hurry: some parts are good, some are bad. So it's not like old-time classics, but still worth seeing.