Greenes Please don't spend money on this.

Tedfoldol everything you have heard about this movie is true.

Nessieldwi Very interesting film. Was caught on the premise when seeing the trailer but unsure as to what the outcome would be for the showing. As it turns out, it was a very good film.

PiraBit if their story seems completely bonkers, almost like a feverish work of fiction, you ain't heard nothing yet.

Horst in Translation (filmreviews@web.de) It's quite a lot of fun to watch Amy Muller dance, jump and trip across the stage in this short movie. Quite a pity these 13 seconds are the only footage of her ever put on tape, while some other dancers reappeared a couple times. Her dancing is elegant and childlike at the same time. I totally wanted to join in and dance with her. Her white dress is truly a thing of beauty, almost a wedding dress and her huge smile is truly contagious.This is one of my very favorite early silent films and even with its short running time it left a lasting impression on me. Thank you Miss Muller.

Michael_Elliott Amy Muller (1896) *** (out of 4)Another Edison short, which took a popular vaudeville dancer, in this case Amy Muller, and put her on camera to make some cash. Considering the controversy that was following movies back in the day I'm sure this one here caused quite a stir as the dance, while not graphic by today's standards, was probably fairly shocking to certain groups. Muller appears to have been forgotten today with her more famous dancer Annabelle taking over but this short remains pretty interesting even though the print has all sorts of jumps in it. The film runs less than a half a minute but we do get a brief look at Muller doing her famous toe dance but once again the overall entertainment level is more on the historic side of the short than anything else.

Snow Leopard This short movie featuring vaudeville dancer Amy Muller is similar in its basic format to the better-known 1890s features starring Annabelle (Whitford) Moore. Muller's act has a different style and appearance, and this is still worth seeing. At the time, it was also released in a hand-tinted version, which apparently no longer survives, and with the tinting plus a clean original print, it probably looked very good.Muller's specialty was dancing on her toes, and she gives some samples of that as well as demonstrating a couple of her other skills. It's also hard not to notice her very puffy, frilly, dress, which creates part of the effect. Although the print is rather blurry and has a couple of larger defects, you can still tell that she has plenty of energy and talent.There are surviving 'Annabelle' features both with and without the hand-tinting, and the tinted features are noticeably different. It seems likely that this feature also might look pretty impressive with flashes of different colors that coordinate with the dance movements. Even without the tinting, it still has some good footage worth seeing.

Kieran Kenney In this very brief film, dancer Amy Muller does a very energetic dance, while wearing an incredible dress. The puffy sleeves are fabulous. Amy's appearance calls to mind Mary Pickford, and pre-dates her first screen appearance. She shows off her flexibility quite impressively as well, with a couple of high kicks and an effortless hand stand.This was, apparently, Amy Muller's only performance in a film, which is a shame, since she's clearly very talented. Her performance is not as visually striking as Annabelle Moore's serpantine dances, nor is it as sexy. I'd hate to assume that 1896 audiences were as innocent and as easily scandalized and aroused as most modern-day viewers tend to believe. This could hardly be the raciest of productions of the time. Today's standards, at least, find it charming and amusing. It's a cute piece of work that I recommend for those seeking something besides the Annabelle loops.